I completed my Goodreads reading challenge today! Luckily the year is not over yet and I plan to read more during my holidays. Because of my reader's block earlier this year, my Goodreads reading challenge was set at a measly 50 books, compared to the 130 I read last year. I haven't decided yet whether or not I will participate in the challenge again next year. There are two articles from BookRiot: one for participating and one against participating in the challenge. Both have very valid points. I, too, feel pressure when I'm behind or when I fail to reach my goal (only 130 of 150 last year). My original goal for this year was again 150 but the longer my reader's block lingered the less achievable that goal seemed to be. So I lowered it to a more manageable 50 and even then I've only just managed to complete it. Also, I made a point of reading less Amazon ebooks. Since most of the ones I read last year were more like short stories than actual novels, it didn't seem right to count them towards my reading challenge even if I was actually reading. I guess it's all about our own self-imposed rules or lack thereof. As Jessica Pryde wrote in her article about NOT participating: "The challenge was exacerbated by the guilt that I had so many books in the house, both paper and electronic, and felt that I needed to push through them". I have this problem, too. I recently culled my library of titles I knew I would never read. And yet I still have hundreds of books I do want to read. I have even more ebooks stored away to work my way through. I have plenty of reading material and not enough time. Between my reader's block and becoming a pet owner for the first time, I feel like my reading time is even rarer than it was before. I lament how little reading I have done this year. Even though I have read some great books.
Read on,
Paula
As long as "read" is on my daily to-do list, I know I'll accomplish at least one thing.
Tuesday, December 23, 2014
Sunday, November 30, 2014
On being a book lover
I love books. I love reading books; I love reading books about books. I love talking about books. I love pictures of books; I love quotes about books and reading. I am a book lover.
Later today (probably) I will finish reading "Ex Libris: Confessions of a Common Reader" by Anne Fadiman. I started it yesterday. It is a short (162 pages) collection of essays about being a reader and writer. The best part so far was finding the term 'persistent intellectual curiosity'. Finally, I have found the words to describe my constant mental state. I also love the essay on proofreading; I am happy to know that I am not the only one who has no way to shut that part of my brain off. It's not that I consciously seek out errors but that my brain seems hardwired to find them anyway.
Yesterday, I travelled to Toronto for the Mythbusters Behind The Myths Tour. I had dinner across the street from the Sony Centre at the Oliver & Bonacini Cafe Grill. I ate my dinner while reading "Ex Libris" at a booth with a book-themed wallpaper. I just HAD to take a picture of it.
Finding new-to-me titles to add to my TBR is one of my favourite activities (even if I will never read them all). For me, books I want to read take on a certain aura or personality based on my expectations of the content. I build up anticipation of reading a book based on these expectations. Inevitably I will be wrong about how the content and I will mesh but not always for the worse. Most of the time I will very much enjoy a book even though my interpretation of the blurb (aka the publisher's interpretation of the content) will be vastly different from the actual content of the book. There are times when this results in a book and I parting ways before I have completed reading it. But I think that is the nature of a reader.
Read on,
Paula
Later today (probably) I will finish reading "Ex Libris: Confessions of a Common Reader" by Anne Fadiman. I started it yesterday. It is a short (162 pages) collection of essays about being a reader and writer. The best part so far was finding the term 'persistent intellectual curiosity'. Finally, I have found the words to describe my constant mental state. I also love the essay on proofreading; I am happy to know that I am not the only one who has no way to shut that part of my brain off. It's not that I consciously seek out errors but that my brain seems hardwired to find them anyway.
Finding new-to-me titles to add to my TBR is one of my favourite activities (even if I will never read them all). For me, books I want to read take on a certain aura or personality based on my expectations of the content. I build up anticipation of reading a book based on these expectations. Inevitably I will be wrong about how the content and I will mesh but not always for the worse. Most of the time I will very much enjoy a book even though my interpretation of the blurb (aka the publisher's interpretation of the content) will be vastly different from the actual content of the book. There are times when this results in a book and I parting ways before I have completed reading it. But I think that is the nature of a reader.
Read on,
Paula
Saturday, November 1, 2014
Halloween reading
I don't like to be scared. I am not a fan of horror movies or scary anything. And yet, listening to the latest episode of The Readers podcast has induced me to read "The Legend of Sleepy Hollow" by Washington Irving and "Hound of the Baskervilles" by Arthur Conan Doyle for Halloween. Since "Hound of the Baskervilles" is a part of the complete Sherlock Holmes book that I'm reading, I will be making progress on that too. And the only version I know of Sleepy Hollow is the animated Disney version that I haven't seen in ages so I have forgotten how it ends.
The Legend of Sleepy Hollow:
Wow! The most drastic difference between the original text and the animated Disney version is that Ichabod Crane doesn't get nearly enough description in the movie. In the text, Crane is useful and agreeable and surrounded by a bevy of females drawn to his "gentlemanlike personage" and his intelligence. He believed in witchcraft and superstitions but was easily spooked. I listened to the Overdue podcast episode about "The Legend of Sleepy Hollow" and was happy to discover that I am not the only person who found the actual text of this story to be disappointing and so not scary at all. Basically it is a story of a love triangle that ends with a prank.
Hound of the Baskervilles:
Yet another story that disappoints if you're looking for a spooky read. I guess I am too preoccupied with trying to solve the mystery to be susceptible to vague supposition. Also, it is debated throughout the plot as to whether or not the hound is real or supernatural or whether it exists at all. Aside from that, I did enjoy reading it. There is just enough suspense to keep you reading. This is a Watson-focused story where Holmes doesn't show up until close to the end of the story. It has a number of side plots that eventually each get tied up until you all you have left is the main mystery. The Book Fight podcast episode about "Hound of the Baskervilles" discusses a lot of ideas that I had myself about the pompous nature of Holmes and how looks down on Watson (Succinctly stated as 'Mike wants to know: Is Sherlock Holmes supposed to be a giant dick? Why does Watson keep working for him?')
Overall, it was enjoyable reading but not nearly as spooky or scary as implied by the various television/movie adaptations.
Have you read either of these stories? How spooky or non-spooky did you find them?
Read on,
Paula
The Legend of Sleepy Hollow:
Wow! The most drastic difference between the original text and the animated Disney version is that Ichabod Crane doesn't get nearly enough description in the movie. In the text, Crane is useful and agreeable and surrounded by a bevy of females drawn to his "gentlemanlike personage" and his intelligence. He believed in witchcraft and superstitions but was easily spooked. I listened to the Overdue podcast episode about "The Legend of Sleepy Hollow" and was happy to discover that I am not the only person who found the actual text of this story to be disappointing and so not scary at all. Basically it is a story of a love triangle that ends with a prank.
Hound of the Baskervilles:
Yet another story that disappoints if you're looking for a spooky read. I guess I am too preoccupied with trying to solve the mystery to be susceptible to vague supposition. Also, it is debated throughout the plot as to whether or not the hound is real or supernatural or whether it exists at all. Aside from that, I did enjoy reading it. There is just enough suspense to keep you reading. This is a Watson-focused story where Holmes doesn't show up until close to the end of the story. It has a number of side plots that eventually each get tied up until you all you have left is the main mystery. The Book Fight podcast episode about "Hound of the Baskervilles" discusses a lot of ideas that I had myself about the pompous nature of Holmes and how looks down on Watson (Succinctly stated as 'Mike wants to know: Is Sherlock Holmes supposed to be a giant dick? Why does Watson keep working for him?')
Overall, it was enjoyable reading but not nearly as spooky or scary as implied by the various television/movie adaptations.
Have you read either of these stories? How spooky or non-spooky did you find them?
Read on,
Paula
Thursday, October 30, 2014
"Flee, Fly, Flown" by Janet Hepburn
Synopsis:When Lillian and Audrey hatch a plot to escape from Tranquil Meadows Nursing Home, "borrow" a car, and spend their hastily planned vacation time driving to destinations west, they aren't fully aware of the challenges they will face. All they know is that the warm days of August call to them, and the need to escape the daily routines and humiliations of nursing home life has become overwhelming. Flushed with the success of their escape plan, they set out on their journey having forgotten that their memory problems might make driving and following directions difficult. Their trip is almost over before it begins, until they meet up with the unsuspecting Rayne, a young man also heading west in hope of reconciling with his family. As Lillian and Audrey try to take back the control that time and dementia has taken from them, Rayne realizes the truth of their situation. But it's too late - he has fallen under the spell of these two funny, brave women and is willing to be a part of their adventure, wherever it leads them.
Review:
The story is told from Lillian's point of view and she has Alzheimer's Disease. I am lucky never to have had anyone in my family with this disease so I can't verify the validity of the author's portrayal of it. But if this accurately describes what Alzheimer's Disease is like, I hope I never get it. I also hope I live a long, active life. Being young, I can't predict what my future holds but this book has made me think about what kind of old age I would like to have and how I will treat my mother as she ages.
I consider this book to be the Canadian female version of Jonas Jonasson's "The Hundred Year Old Man Who Climbed Out of the Window and Disappeared" because it's another book about elderly people escaping their nursing home/retirement home/whatever politically correct euphemism you want to use. It just doesn't have as much suspense and historical events. "Flee, Fly, Flown" focuses more on the personal lives of the main characters. Some readers might find the plot somewhat far-fetched simply because it runs primarily on circumstance.
"Flee, Fly, Flown" is one of the titles nominated for the 2014 Ontario Library Association's Forest of Reading Evergreen Award. It is the only title on the shortlist that was/is of any interest to me and I am glad I read it. It gets my vote!
Read on,
Paula
Labels:
Canadian authors,
Janet Hepburn,
Jonas Jonasson,
Reviews
Another Terry Fallis visit
I attended another Terry Fallis author talk. It reinforced what a great speaker and how naturally humorous he is. Having read his novel "No Relation" earlier this year, it was nice to get the rehashed version during his talk. Listening to him read a scene from the novel also reinforced that authors are the best people to read their own works because they have a unique personal insight and so can bring more life to it than anyone else possibly could. I mentioned in my review about wanting to listen to the podcast versions he has made of all his books but I have not previously done that.
During his talk, he also gave an overview of Ernest Hemingway's life. I am not overly familiar with Hemingway aside from reading "The Old Man and the Sea" in high school. If the ending hadn't been so defeatingly depressing, I would have liked the book a whole lot more. So it was surprising to learn that his later years were overshadowed by depression and illness that affected his ability to write. This has revived my own interest in writing, even if it is just for myself. Terry Fallis said he didn't write his first novel until he was 45 so it's not too late for me if I decide to try it.
Terry also gave us an overview of the novel he is still in the process of writing now. This is the second time that the brief synopsis of his upcoming novel has had me eagerly awaiting its publication. It happened that way with "No Relation" and now again with "Poles Apart", the working title.
There was a book signing at the end of the talk and my friend bought a copy to get signed. I told him that because of the James Moriarty storyline, I visited the Toronto Reference Library just to see the Sherlock Holmes collection they have. I had not heard of it until I read about it in "No Relation".
It was a bookishly inspiring night for me and I am so glad I went. Terry says that his new book should be out sometime in the fall of 2015. Just in time for the Word on the Street festival?? If so, perhaps we will see him there.
Read on,
Paula
Friday, October 3, 2014
Book bingo update
Well, it is officially autumn now so I thought I would let you know the results of my summer Book Bingo. I am happy to say that I did get a Bingo! I happened to read one book that qualified for four squares in a row.
"The Hundred-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out The Window And Disappeared" by Jonas Jonasson:
Did you get a bingo?
Read on,
Paula
"The Hundred-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out The Window And Disappeared" by Jonas Jonasson:
- By an author of a different gender
- Translation
- Borrowed from the library
- By an author of a different culture
Did you get a bingo?
Read on,
Paula
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
Ah, the golden days of autumn
Whether it is a biological urge due to the shortening of days or a societal rule about the season, I find autumn to be the time of year when I just want to cook. All the time. I am now aware of a desire to experiment with international foods and ingredients I have never tasted before. In general, I love seeking out new recipes to try. Whenever we get a new cookbook at work, I am flipping through it to see if it is worth taking home for a better, more in-depth look.
I recently took home "Aida Mollenkamp's Keys to the Kitchen: The Essential Reference for Becoming a More Accomplished, Adventurous Cook" by Aida Mollenkamp. Part reference book and part cookbook, I am finding I am taking a long time to read it because it has so much information in it. What I have read I have thoroughly enjoyed and will most likely end up buying my own copy. I am planning a reorganization of my kitchen storage of pots, pans, and food storage containers. And this book is great for motivation. The more I read, the more time I want to spend in my kitchen.
As it is autumn, I am also thinking of trying new autumnal foods that I haven't tried before. Luckily, when I flipped through Aida's recipes, the book fell open to her recipe for Roasted Squash Pasta With Sage Brown Butter. Two ingredients I've never cooked with before: butternut squash and sage. The recipe sounds tasty and easy enough for me. Although I haven't finished the book yet, I would recommend it to people who like to cook (no matter the skill level).
Read/cook on,
Paula
Thursday, September 11, 2014
BTT: Interactive?
BTT: Interactive? (from Booking Through Thursday)
With the advent (and growing popularity) of eBooks, I’m seeing more and more articles about how much “better” they can be, because they have the option to be interactive … videos, music, glossaries … all sorts of little extra goodies to help “enhance” your reading experience, rather like listening to the Director’s commentary on a DVD of your favorite movie.
How do you feel about that possibility? Does it excite you in a cutting-edge kind of way? Or does it chill you to the bone because that’s not what reading is ABOUT?
I've been reading the complete Sherlock Holmes stories. I own a massive trade paperback version but, because I want to keep it in mint condition, I am only reading it when I am at home and reading it in ebook version when away from home. For me, the best feature ever about ebooks is the dictionary function that allows me to get a definition of words I don't know. This is particularly beneficial when reading older fiction such as Arthur Conan Doyle, Jane Austen, etc. Unfortunately, it does not work for foreign languages in my iBooks app on my iPhone4.
I am one of those people who reads both print books and ebooks. I like ebooks for their portability and my ability to have a huge stack of books on my phone. But I love holding a print book in my hand. I love the artistry of the covers that some of my ebooks don't have. I am not one-or-the-other. As long as I am reading, I don't care what format. Even listening to someone read to you (audiobook) still counts as reading. Your brain has absorbed the information just the same. Who cares how you read as long as you do it?
Read on,
Paula
I am one of those people who reads both print books and ebooks. I like ebooks for their portability and my ability to have a huge stack of books on my phone. But I love holding a print book in my hand. I love the artistry of the covers that some of my ebooks don't have. I am not one-or-the-other. As long as I am reading, I don't care what format. Even listening to someone read to you (audiobook) still counts as reading. Your brain has absorbed the information just the same. Who cares how you read as long as you do it?
Read on,
Paula
Labels:
Arthur Conan Doyle,
Booking Through Thursday,
Ebooks
Sunday, August 24, 2014
BTT: Visual; Not In Theaters
BTT: Visual (from Booking Through Thursday)
So … the books that you own (however many there may be) … do you display them proudly right there in plain sight for all the world to see? (At least the world that comes into your living room.) Or do you keep them tucked away in your office or bedroom or library or closet or some place less “public?”
I have three 6" tall x 2" wide bookcases in my livingroom where my personal library lives. They are not completely full...I have two empty shelves. And I have one shelf in my kitchen for my cookbooks. I am also contemplating putting a bookshelf in my bedroom instead of having a pile on my nightstand. As I continue to add to my collection, I will eventually need to add more bookcases.
BTT: Not in Theaters (from Booking Through Thursday)
Name one book that you hope never, ever, ever gets made into a movie (no matter how good that movie might be).
The All Souls trilogy by Deborah Harkness. Having both read and watched the Harry Potter and Twilight series, I know that cinematographers will not be able to capture it to meet the standards in my imagination.
Read on,
Paula
So … the books that you own (however many there may be) … do you display them proudly right there in plain sight for all the world to see? (At least the world that comes into your living room.) Or do you keep them tucked away in your office or bedroom or library or closet or some place less “public?”
I have three 6" tall x 2" wide bookcases in my livingroom where my personal library lives. They are not completely full...I have two empty shelves. And I have one shelf in my kitchen for my cookbooks. I am also contemplating putting a bookshelf in my bedroom instead of having a pile on my nightstand. As I continue to add to my collection, I will eventually need to add more bookcases.
BTT: Not in Theaters (from Booking Through Thursday)
Name one book that you hope never, ever, ever gets made into a movie (no matter how good that movie might be).
The All Souls trilogy by Deborah Harkness. Having both read and watched the Harry Potter and Twilight series, I know that cinematographers will not be able to capture it to meet the standards in my imagination.
Read on,
Paula
Sunday, August 3, 2014
World events: Jonasson versus Doyle
It wasn't intentional. It just happened that I read Jonas Jonasson's "The 100 Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out the Window and Disappeared" while reading Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's "The Penguin Complete Sherlock Holmes".
While I enjoyed reading Jonasson's book, it eventually got to the point where I couldn't suspend my disbelief any more. The main character, Allan Karlsson, just happens to be involved in certain world events during his lifetime (the atomic bomb, the Korean War, the Spanish Civil War, etc.). While many people are involved in world events, by the end of the book I just couldn't believe that one person could coincidentally be involved in so many of them.
I have only read two stories from the complete Sherlock Holmes so far ("A Study in Scarlet" and "The Sign of the Four"). These also involve world events. In these stories, so far it is the culprit's backstory that involves the telling of the historical events. In the first it is the history of the Mormons in Utah and a bit about their religious behaviours. In the second, it is the Indian Rebellion of 1857. There are history lessons in both the Jonasson and Doyle books; however, I find them more palatable in the Sherlock Holmes stories. Even though the events are recounted briefly (within a chapter) in both the Jonasson and Doyle books, I find that Doyle's writing style makes the world events far more interesting to read.
The way that Doyle has incorporated the world events into the two stories I have read so far intrigue me as to what other events will be mentioned in upcoming stories.
Read on,
Paula
While I enjoyed reading Jonasson's book, it eventually got to the point where I couldn't suspend my disbelief any more. The main character, Allan Karlsson, just happens to be involved in certain world events during his lifetime (the atomic bomb, the Korean War, the Spanish Civil War, etc.). While many people are involved in world events, by the end of the book I just couldn't believe that one person could coincidentally be involved in so many of them.
I have only read two stories from the complete Sherlock Holmes so far ("A Study in Scarlet" and "The Sign of the Four"). These also involve world events. In these stories, so far it is the culprit's backstory that involves the telling of the historical events. In the first it is the history of the Mormons in Utah and a bit about their religious behaviours. In the second, it is the Indian Rebellion of 1857. There are history lessons in both the Jonasson and Doyle books; however, I find them more palatable in the Sherlock Holmes stories. Even though the events are recounted briefly (within a chapter) in both the Jonasson and Doyle books, I find that Doyle's writing style makes the world events far more interesting to read.
The way that Doyle has incorporated the world events into the two stories I have read so far intrigue me as to what other events will be mentioned in upcoming stories.
Read on,
Paula
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
